On the afternoon of Jan. 12, 2010 the earth shook violently in a small island nation in the Caribbean. The aftermath shook the collective conscience of the developed world.
Haiti, one of the world’s poorest countries prior to the 7.0 magnitude earthquake, suffered widespread devastation. Death, displacement, and disruption of supply lines were plastered on newspapers and TV screens worldwide. Cracked beyond repair, the presidential palace symbolized a fractured nation.
The world responded.
Celebrities held a massive “Hope for Haiti” telethon to raise money. Text message based giving, where $10 would be added to a cellphone bill, allowed small, impulse donations. Millions of dollars flowed from donors to aid organizations like UNICEF, Oxfam, and, now notoriously, the American Red Cross.
On the Ground
Conduit Mission, based out of Franklin, Tennessee, was a smaller organization helping in the direct aftermath. Conduit’s investment in the Haitian people started long before the earthquake—nearly a decade ago—supporting the people in the city of Jacmel. When the disaster struck, Conduit’s existing infrastructure allowed for immediate assistance, along side the other major aid organizations.
Ben Holeton, who had traveled to Haiti with Conduit before, arrived on the ground in Haiti the day after Port-Au-Prince airport opened back up to commercial traffic, about six weeks after the disaster. “To see places I knew lying on the ground in rubble was definitely a harrowing experience,” Holeton says. “It’s hard to forget.”
Waste
Over five years post disaster, an investigative report released by NPR and ProPublica challenged the narrative released by one of the biggest aid organizations operating in Haiti: the American Red Cross. The report found that, with nearly $500 million raised, only six permanent houses were constructed. This number stands in contrast to the Red Cross claim of sheltering over 100,000 Haitians.
Although the organization was on the ground early providing necessary relief, the report has tarnished the reputation of the Red Cross’s efforts in Haiti. Darren Tyler, founder of Conduit Mission, says the report confirmed what many people on the ground already knew about the Red Cross: they are not equipped for long term redevelopment.
In contrast, Conduit has built 52 homes in Haiti with only a few hundred thousand dollars. Conduit’s relationships with the Haitian people gave them a mandate for action. “These were our friends.” Tyler says. “And, so, when your friend’s house gets knocked down, you want to do whatever you can to help them.”
Holeton was personally involved with building six houses. He says part of a smaller organization’s effectiveness is the ability to adapt. Conduit has the flexibility to change course as needs arise. A large organization, like the Red Cross, is much more bureaucratic and rigid. “They operate like a government,” Holeton says.
Part of that inflexibility stops the Red Cross from looking long term, and instead seeks short-term fixes for problems. The shelters provided by the Red Cross, somehow costing $5,000, were more like plywood tents—no match for the tropical climate and hurricanes common in Haiti. Conduit on the other hand was able to provide concrete houses for a cost of $6,500. Tyler says they are looking forward at how they can innovate the housing, not just replace it. “The theory being: not only increasing the quality of life, but the possibility of life so that they are living differently now,” Tyler says.
While the methods and actions of the organizations are different, the Red Cross’s operations affect the smaller organizations on the ground. As the sentiment grew among locals that large NGOs were not addressing the concerns of the Haitian people, aftershocks rippled through the community Conduit served. Tyler recalls making an unplanned trip to meet with community leaders, who expressed concern. Protestors held signs written in Creole and threw rocks at the building, where they met. Conduit’s financial transparency was able to re-establish calm, but remains a lesson in how organizational reputations can be bundled in disaster areas.
Moving Forward
As the report makes waves in the United States, another concern is how it will affect future disaster relief efforts.
“That’s my biggest concern.” Holeton says. “The next time a Haiti happens, or an Indonesia, people are like ‘oh, the Red Cross didn’t do anything. They didn’t do nearly as good as I expected them to last time, so I’m not going to donate any money.’ That hurts.” He and Tyler agree that the relationships Conduit has built with supporters should shield them from financial backlash.
“We just really try to empower our tribe.” Tyler says. “So instead of going wide, we try to go deep.”
This allows Conduit to have a truly global reach. Besides Haiti, the organization operates in Togo, Africa, Guatemala, India, and conducts disaster relief in the United States.
A Conduit
With a stated goal to be “a ‘conduit’ of God’s power, God’s love, and God’s resources,” Conduit focuses on the humanity of the people it serves. With Haiti only resurfacing in the news because of the scrutiny on the Red Cross, Conduit’s tribe has a different perspective. “When I hear talk about what’s going on down there, to me, it’s not just a poor country in the Caribbean,” Holeton says. “It’s my friends and family down there, people that I know and love.”
Conduit is a small player in the humanitarian aid world. If its track record is a sign of effectiveness, the smaller players may end up changing the game.